Legal Opinion

Owen v. City of Portland

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 2021No. S068000PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

661 Argued and submitted May 4; decision of Court of Appeals affirmed, judgment of circuit court vacated, and case remanded to circuit court for further proceedings November 4, 2021 Phillip E. OWEN, an individual; Owen Properties, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company; and Michael L. Feves, an individual, Petitioners on Review, v. CITY OF PORTLAND, an Oregon municipal corporation, Respondent on Review. (CC 17CV05043) (CA A165633) (SC S068000)

497 P3d 1216

The city enacted an ordinance requiring landlords to make relocation assistance payments to tenants in some circumstances, based in part…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Sanchez-Llamas v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Brennen v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Couey v. AtkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2015

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Roberts v. City of Cannon BeachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  2. Schwartz v. Washington CountyOregon Supreme Court · 2026
  3. 21+ Tobacco and Vapor Retail Assn. v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  4. 21+ Tobacco and Vapor Retail Assn. v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  5. Depaul Industries v. City of PortlandDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2022

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API