Legal Opinion

Goodman v. Super Mold Corp. of California

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 24, 1940No. Na. 8851PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

Appellant has filed a petition for rehearing. In addition thereto he claims to have discovered an anticipating, patent issued September 28, 1920 to A. R. Thompson, No. 1,354,227, for a tire mold. In order to take advantage of this discovery appellant presents the same to this court with affidavits purporting to show due diligence in the search of patent office records and that, notwithstanding such diligence, the Thompson patent was not discovered. These affidavits accompany a petition to this court for leave to present to the trial court a petition for rehearing in…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Paul E. Hawkinson Co. v. GoodmanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1940
  2. Manville Boiler Co. v. Columbia Boiler Co. of Pottstown, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Super Mold Corp. v. BaconCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
  4. Super Mold Corp. v. BaconDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API