Super Mold Corp. v. Bacon
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
Complaint and cross-complaint for infringement of patents for tire retread devices. Relief was denied both parties, and both appeal.
Plaintiff, Super Mold Corporation of California, sued for infringement, of claims *8611, 5, 6, 7 and 13 of Smith patent No. 1,662,-035, issued March 6, 1928. This patent we held valid in Goodman v. Super Mold Corp., 9 Cir., 103 F.2d 474, rehearing denied 109 F.2d 442. It is for the combination with a retread device, of rings to press against the sides of the tire to force the tread against the matrix, both by “toggle action” of the tire side…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stilz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Goodman v. Super Mold Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- Goodman v. Super Mold Corp. of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. 62 PACKAGES, ETC.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944