Legal Opinion

Super Mold Corp. v. Bacon

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 12, 1941No. 21522-RPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ROCHE, District Judge.

This is a suit for patent infringement of claims 1, 5, 6, 7, and 13 of patent No. 1,-662,035 and claims 1 and 2 of patent No. 1,764,378. These patents, held by plaintiff by means of assignments, cover- apparatus for retreading of tires. In a recent opin*595ion by the Circuit Court (Goodman v. Super Mold Corp. of California, 9 Cir., 103 F.2d 474), the validity of the first patent was sustained. On a petition for rehearing, the Circuit Court wrote a second opinion (Goodman v. Super Mold Corp. of California, 9 Cir., 109 F.2d 442), maintaining its position and denying the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Goodman v. Super Mold Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  2. Goodman v. Super Mold Corp. of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API