Gessner v. Palmateer
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County denying a motion to dissolve an attachment. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.
— This is an appeal from an order deny, ing a motion to dissolve an attachment. The motion was made on the ground that the note upon which the action was brought was given to Webster, plaintiff’s assignor, in part payment for certain land purchased from him by defendant; that Webster had a vendor’s lien as security for the pajrment of the note; that the lien passed to plaintiff by the assignment of the note, and being thus secured, an attachment was improper.
The affidavit filed in support of the motion states that the defendant purchased certain land from Webster, under a contract which…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sparks v. HessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Avery v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Lowery v. PetersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- McClintic v. Wise's adm'orsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1874
- Stevens v. ChadwickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Bennett v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Longmaid v. CoulterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Union Supply Co. v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Willman v. FriedmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1893
- Southern Pacific Co. v. MillerNevada Supreme Court · 1916
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.