Clyne v. Easton, Eldrige & Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL by plaintiff from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco granting a new trial of certain issues to defendant, and by defendant from an order refusing a new trial of other issues. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.
The trial of this cause in the superior court resulted in a judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant moved for a new trial, and its motion was granted as to some of the issues, but denied as to the others. Both parties appeal—plaintiff from that part of the order which directs a new trial of the issues as to which the findings are vacated, and defendant from the part which denies a new trial of the remaining issues. The record is of course the same on both appeals, and they have been submitted together.
The salient facts of the case are that the defendant, a California corporation, prior to the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gow v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Carter v. Los Angeles Nat'l. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Beltaire v. George Rosenberg & SonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Rudolph v. SaundersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Glugermovich v. ZicovichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by10 opinions
- Arthur Frank Millard v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Turner v. EversAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1973
- Turner v. EversCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Yosemite Growers Co-op Ass'n v. Case-Swayne Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946
- Hougham v. RowlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.