Legal Opinion

Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago R. R. v. Collingwood

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1880No. 7078PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Erom the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

This case has been twice tried by a jury, and is in this court for the second time. Collingwood v. The I., P. & C. R. W. Co., 54 Ind. 15. Both trials resulted in verdicts against the appellant. In the last trial the jury returned, with the general verdict, an answer to an interrogatory propounded by appellant, in which they find that the horse of plaintiff was killed by coming in actual contact with the locomotive and cars of appellant. The appellant insists, that, under the case of The Ohio, etc., R. W. Co. v. Cole, 41 Ind. 331, this judgment must be reversed, because it does not appear that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. ColeIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Collingwood v. Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Union Mutual Life Insurance v. BuchananIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Riehl v. Evansville Foundry Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. McKeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Shugart v. MilesIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Kempf v. HimselIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API