Legal Opinion

Litzinger v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 8, 1999PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOYLE, Judge.

Lawrence Litzinger (Claimant) appeals from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board, which affirmed the decision of a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) granting the petition of Builders Transport (Employer) to modify Claimant’s benefits.

On or about July 26, 1993, Employer hired Claimant to work as a truck driver and, in that capacity, Claimant transported goods from Employer’s Carlisle, Pennsylvania, facility to various interstate locations. When Claimant was driving he would be away from home for three to four days at a time, and he would sleep in a sleeper unit…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Dilkus v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Karpulk v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Worth & Co.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Scheib v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Womeldorf, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Tim Neal v. Annett Holdings, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  2. Harmon v. Irby Construction Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Bentley v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Davis v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Giboo v. Certified Transmission RebuildersNebraska Supreme Court · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API