Legal Opinion

Karpulk v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Worth & Co.)

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 5, 1998No. 1700 C.D. 1997PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIEDMAN, Judge.

Gary Karpulk (Claimant) appeals from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB) affirming the decision of the workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) to suspend Claimant’s compensation benefits under The Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act (Act). 1 We reverse.

Claimant received disability benefits for a work-related back injury sustained on January 9, 1991 while he was employed with Worth and Company (Employer). On or about May 17,1991, Employer filed a petition to terminate, suspend or modify compensation benefits payable to Claimant, 2 alleging that, as of May 13,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Lukens, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Berks County Home v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Titusville Hospital v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Dilkus v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Money v. FlowersNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Riddle v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Litzinger v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Kelly Services v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  5. Newhouse v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API