Legal Opinion

Scheib v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 23, 1991No. 340 C.D. 1991PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PELLEGRINI, Judge.

Clarita B. Scheib (Claimant) appeals from the order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) reversing the Referee’s denial of a Petition for Suspension of Total Disability Benefits because the Referee’s finding that the work offered to Claimant was not suitable was not supported by substantial evidence.

On February 18, 1985, while working as a clerk at Ames Department Store (Employer), Claimant slipped on a wet floor, injuring her right knee, causing her to be unable to stand or walk for more than 15 minutes at a time. Although she attempted to return, she was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Titusville Hospital v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Hendry v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. State Products Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dilkus v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Litzinger v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Goodwill Industries of Pittsburgh v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Helen Mining Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Hershey v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API