Doe v. Kansas Department of Human Resources
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Davis, J.:
This case presents the question whether a workers compensation claimant’s use of a false name in applying for benefits and lying under oath as to her identity in the proceeding to obtain benefits were fraudulent or abusive acts under K.S.A. 44-5,120 (1993 Furse) even though the claimant was legally entitled to the benefits she received. Jane Doe, a/k/a Victoria Acosta, a/k/a Deha Butanda, appeals from the district court order affirming the final order of the Secretary of Human Resources imposing a civil fine against Butanda for fraudulent or…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Koch v. Koch Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- State v. KleypasSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
- Nordstrom v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
- Tetuan v. A.H. Robins Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1987
- Timi v. Prescott State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Shehata v. Salvation ArmyAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
- In Re DoeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
- DeBoer v. American Appraisal Associates, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2007
- Huang v. Zhongcheng Packaging USA Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2021
- LJ Beck Roofing and Guttering v. Kansas Dept. of LaborCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2026