Legal Opinion

In Re Doe

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 14, 2004No. 90,124PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

277 Kan. 795 (2004)

90 P.3d 940

IN THE MATTER OF JANE DOE, a/k/a VICTORIA ACOSTA, a/k/a/ DELIA BUTANDA, Appellant,

v.

KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, Appellee.

No. 90,124.

Supreme Court of Kansas.

Opinion filed May 14, 2004.

Diane F. Barger, of Dallas, Texas, argued the cause and was on the brief for appellant.

Darren E. Root, Kansas Department of Human Resources, argued the cause and was on the brief for appellee.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

DAVIS, J.:

This case presents the question whether a workers compensation claimant's use of a false name in applying for benefits and lying…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Koch v. Koch Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  2. State v. KleypasSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  3. Nordstrom v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  4. Tetuan v. A.H. Robins Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  5. Timi v. Prescott State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Coma Corp. v. Kansas Department of LaborSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  2. Fisher v. Kansas Crime Victims Compensation BoardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  3. Bluestem Telephone Co. v. Kansas Corporation Comm'nCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2005
  4. Manzano v. Kansas Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2014
  5. State v. BannonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API