Woodruff v. Naik
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Benham, Judge.
The appellants are the widow of Gilbert P. Woodruff and the administratrix of his estate. The appellees are a doctor and a nurse who were defendants in a medical malpractice case arising from the death of Woodruff. This appeal is from a judgment entered on a jury verdict for the defendants.
1. In appellants’ first enumeration of error, they complain that a doctor called as an expert witness was permitted to give an opinion without being asked a hypothetical question. Assuming that the trial court erred in permitting the testimony (but see Division 5 of this opinion), we find it…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hyles v. CockrillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Premium Distributing Co. v. National Distributing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Shannon v. KaylorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Jackson v. RodriquezCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- Sutphin v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hornsby v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Kohl v. TiradoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Clayton County Water Authority v. HarbinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Department of Transportation v. RudesealCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.