Brisk v. State
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHallows, C. J.
At the preliminary hearing, Brisk took the stand to testify the confession was not voluntary. His testimony was either not believed by the magistrate or was not deemed to constitute involuntariness.
After the judge allowed the confession in evidence, the district attorney asked Brisk whether or not he had actually committed the crime. Brisk claimed his right under the fifth amendment not to answer on the ground he might incriminate himself. The county court, however, instructed Brisk he was required to answer the question and in response he admitted he took the car. On the hearing on the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State ex rel. Durner v. HueginWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- State v. ReppinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Pulaski v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Hawkins v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. BiastockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Edwards v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Farrar v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. GuidenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- State v. KriegerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
- State v. HarrisWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.