State v. Guiden
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.
The defendant seeks to withdraw his guilty plea and have a new trial ordered as “. . . necessary to correct a manifest injustice.” There are three reasons why this will not, should not and cannot be done.
It would be enough here to point out that no motion for withdrawal of the plea of guilty has been made in the trial court. In fact the defendant has never suggested to the trial court in any way whatsoever that the court erred either in (1) accepting his plea of guilty to the charge of burglary, or (2) in finding him guilty of burglary. This court has made it entirely clear on a number of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. ReppinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Hawkins v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Strait v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Roberts v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. KoernerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- State v. RiekkoffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. SchulzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
- State v. VerhasseltWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Moes v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.