State v. Biastock
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.
The sole issue presented on this appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying defendant’s post-conviction motion to withdraw his plea of guilty.
In State v. Reppin, 1 this court adopted the “manifest injustice” test as set forth in the American Bar Association Project on Minimum Standards for Criminal Justice — Pleas of Guilty. 2
Under those standards a defendant should be permitted to withdraw his plea of guilty if he is able to prove that his plea was made under any of the following situations:
“ (1) [H] e was denied the effective assistance of counsel guaranteed to him by constitution,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Foster v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. ReppinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Ernst v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Nelson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. RiekkoffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Powell v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. BarteltWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.