Legal Opinion

Tobin v. City of Peoria, Ill.

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided August 29, 1996No. 95-1374PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MIHM, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [# 3]. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED on the merits as to the issue of whether the Ordinance in question is constitutional on its face and GRANTED WITHOUT PREJUDICE on the issue of whether the Ordinance is constitutional as applied because that issue is not ripe for adjudication at this time. The Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs’ Fair Housing Act allegations, and Plaintiffs have 21 days to replead the deficient allegation.

Factual Background

In 1995, the City…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Jones v. WildgenDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
  2. Molex Inc. v. WylerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004
  3. Basic v. Fitzroy Engineering, Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
  4. City of Vincennes v. EmmonsIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Kenneth M. Crook v. City of Madison, MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2015

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API