Legal Opinion
City of Vincennes v. Emmons
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided January 25, 2006No. 42S02-0504-CV-131PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOEHM, Justice.
We hold that a city's housing code is not unenforceable for failure to include an express warrant procedure in the event a landlord objects to an inspection.
Facts and Procedural History
The City of Vincennes Rental Housing Code ("Code") sets standards for residential rental units and provides for regulation and inspection of units.1 Kevin Emmons, *157Jeffery Hendrixson, and Eric Klein each own one or more residential rental properties in Vincennes and failed to pay the required annual registration fee of $18 per unit. The City brought civil actions against each of the landlords to…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Indiana Newspapers, Inc. v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Akeem Daniels, Cameron Stingily, and Nicholas Stoner v. FanDuel, Inc. and DraftKings, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2018
- Dillinger, LLC v. Electronic Arts Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2011
- State v. PollardIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Virginia E. Alldredge and Julia A. Luker, as Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Venita Hargis v. The Good Samaritan Home, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.