Legal Opinion
Mroczek v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 2, 2001No. 2:99-cv-04049PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM aMd ORDER
JOYNER, District Judge.
This case has been brought before the Court on motion of the defendants for summary judgment. Having now carefully reviewed the record produced by the parties and for the reasons set forth below, the motion shall be granted and judgment in favor of the defendants as a matter of law shall be entered.
Factual Background
On September 21, 1993, Plaintiff, Terry Mroczek began working as an Employee/Organization Development Specialist in the Human Resources Department at Luk-ens Steel Company, Bethlehem Steel Corporation’s predecessor-in-interest, in…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Fasold v. JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Ryan v. General MacHine ProductsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- Butterbaugh v. ChertoffDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- Johnson v. Chase Home FinanceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- Brown v. Boeing Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.