Bank of Union v. Hungerford
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
JONES, C.
This aotion was instituted in the district court of Garfield county 'by the plaintiff in error, as .plaintiff, against the defendant in error, as defendant, to recover the sum of $2,000, evidenced by a certain promissory note, together with interest and attorney’s fee, and on the trial of same before the court and jury, a verdict was rendered in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff, and judgment rendered by the court in accordance with said verdict, from which judgment of the trial court the appellant prosecutes this appeal, and assigns various specifications of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Franklin Phosphate Co. v. International Harvester Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
- Western Silo Co. v. PruittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Farmers' State Bank of Belpre v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tudor v. American Investment Co. of EnidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Gay v. First Nat. BankMississippi Supreme Court · 1935
- American Nat. Bank of Oklahoma City v. JordenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Security Nat. Bank v. BohnefeldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Sturm v. American Bank & Trust Co. of ArdmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.