Gay v. First Nat. Bank
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGriffith, J.
On August 7, 1929, appellants indorsed a. six hundred dollar note. The money was to be used in the purchase of a small tract of timber. Appellants aver that there was an agreement with the bank and the maker of the note, as a condition of the indorsement, that the lumber coming from the timber should be invoiced through the bank and that the bank would deduct forty per cent of the net amounts and place the same to the credit of a stumpage account to be applied to the liquidation of the note. Appellants aver and show that in March, 1930, sufficient had been collected by the hank through the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Franklin Phosphate Co. v. International Harvester Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
- Tallahatchie Home Bank v. AldridgeMississippi Supreme Court · 1934
- Bank of Union v. HungerfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
3Cited by15 opinions
- Holland v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2008
- Turner v. WakefieldMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
- Citizens Nat. Bank v. WaltmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1977
- McArthur v. FillingameMississippi Supreme Court · 1939
- AUSTIN DEVELOPMENT v. Bank of MeridianMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.