Legal Opinion
Sturm v. American Bank & Trust Co. of Ardmore
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 2, 1935No. 24606PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PER CTJRIAM.
Plaintiff in error was defendant below, and defendant in error was plaintiff below. X.et them be referred to herein as in the lower court.
This was a suit instituted in the district court of Carter county, Okla., by the plaintiff, the American Bank & Trust Company of Ardmore, Okla., a corporation, against the defendants E. Dunlap and H. L. Sturm.
Plaintiff declared on a promissory note dated June 13, 3931, for the sum of $2,650. with interest thereon at 10 per cent, per annum until paid, and providing for an attorney’s fee of 10 per cent, additional if collected by attorney or suit.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Franklin Phosphate Co. v. International Harvester Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
- Tudor v. American Investment Co. of EnidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Western Silo Co. v. PruittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Security Nat. Bank v. BohnefeldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Bank of Union v. HungerfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
3Cited by6 opinions
- Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. RichersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Phelps v. MaloneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Colchensky v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Kenney v. EblenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Reinauer v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.