Legal Opinion

Hartman v. Pennsylvania Salt Manufacturing Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 28, 1944No. Appeal, 46PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, P. J.,

Claimant suffered an injury in the course of his employment with the defendant on December 20, 1937. An agreement of compensation was duly entered into and compensation paid under it until April IS, 1938, when claimant returned to work, and executed and delivered a final receipt. He continued in his employment until July 1940, when it was terminated because of the mechanization of defendant’s mine.

On October 15, 1941 claimant filed a petition to set aside the final receipt on the stated grounds of (1) mutual mistake of fact, and (2) the employer’s improper conduct in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Seneca v. Yale & Towne Mfg. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Rodebaugh v. Philadelphia Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  3. Peterson ex rel. Peterson v. Delaware River Ferry Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  4. DeJoseph v. Standard Steel Car Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Kille v. Reading Iron WorksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Overmiller v. D. E. Horn & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Agostin v. Pittsburgh Steel Foundry Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Mallory v. Pittsburgh Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Ketzel v. Hammermill Paper Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Primoli v. Philadelphia Bronze & Brass Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API