Legal Opinion

Ketzel v. Hammermill Paper Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 10, 1946No. Appeal, 79PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Reno, J.,

The claimant appealed from the judgment of the court below, which affirmed the referee and Workmen’s Compensation Board, holding that his petition to set aside a final compensation receipt was filed too late.

Appellant was injured during the course of his employment on September 9, 1938, and suffered what was described as a “severe muscular strain of the back.” He returned to work seventeen days later, on September 26, 1938, and three days later executed a final receipt for the compensation provided by an agreement dated September 23, 1938. Thereafter he was continuously…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kuca v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Commonwealth v. DuffySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881
  3. Cleary v. Quaker City Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. DeJoseph v. Standard Steel Car Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Gault's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1859

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mallory v. Pittsburgh Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Joseph v. BossertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Crimi v. Supreme Clothes, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1961
  4. Silsley v. Pittsburgh Coal Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API