Legal Opinion

Seneca v. Yale & Towne Mfg. Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 31, 1940No. Appeal, 234PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cunningham, J.,

Opinion by

While in the course of his employment, the claimant in this workmen’s compensation case sustained, on August 27, 1937, an accidental injury to his left eye which resulted in the permanent loss of the use of that member. Under the provisions of Section 306(c) of our Workmen’s Compensation Act of June 2, 1915, P. L. 736, as amended April 13, 1927, P. L. 186, 77 PS §513, and in force at the time of the injury, lie became vested, under his contract of hiring, with a statutory right to be compensated for the loss of the use of his eye to the extent of sixty-five per centum…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kuca v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Rosenzweig v. HellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Guy v. Stoecklein Baking Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Ratto v. Pennsylvania Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. DeJoseph v. Standard Steel Car Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Universal Cyclops Steel Corp. v. KrawczynskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Misitis v. Steel City Piping Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Marshall v. Geo. M. Brewster & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  4. Overmiller v. D. E. Horn & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Lester v. State Workmen's Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API