Legal Opinion

Grinter v. Knight

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 19, 2008No. 05-6755PublishedCited by 1,539 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge.

A Kentucky prisoner proceeding pro se appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1983 for violations of due process, equal protection, the Eighth Amendment, and the Fourteenth Amendment during a mandatory screening procedure before the complaint was served on the defendants. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm in part and reverse in part.

I

Henry David Grinter filed a pro se complaint in which he sought relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1983. He names the following persons as…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,539 opinions

  1. Regina McCormick v. Miami UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  2. Flanory v. BonnCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  3. James Luedtke v. David BerkebileCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  4. League of Women Voters of Ohio v. BrunnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  5. Bryan Lamb v. HoweCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017

1,534 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API