Legal Opinion

Stanley v. Barclay

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 20, 1950No. 8 Div. 534PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STAKELY, Justice.

A plat known as the Skelton Addition to the City of Scottsboro, Alabama, contains lots 35 and 36. These lots are adjoining lots and lot 35 is located south of lot 36. Both lots face west on Market Street. Appellee is the owner of lot 35 and also claims title to a driveway north of lot 35 which runs across the south side of lot 36. Appellants claim title to all of lot 36 including the driveway.

Appellants began the construction of a garage apartment at the east end of the driveway which would block the driveway and deprive appellee of the use thereof and a means of ingress and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kidd v. BrowneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  2. Alford v. RodgersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  3. Duke v. WimberlySupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  4. Louis Pizitz Dry Goods Co. v. PenneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  5. Gerald v. HayesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Roberts v. MonroeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  2. Gonzalez v. NamanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  3. Barclay v. StanleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  4. Fesperman v. GrierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  5. Barclay v. StanleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API