Legal Opinion

Louis Pizitz Dry Goods Co. v. Penney

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 9, 1941No. 6 Div. 783PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

This is an action of covenant for breach of warranty against incumbrances embodied in a deed executed by the defendant to the plaintiff on March 4, 1926, conveying to it “The East Half of Lot 16, and the West Half of Lot 17, in Block 98, according to the present plan of Birmingham by the Elyton Land Company; said fractional lots together forming a rectangle fronting 50 feet on the Northern line of First Avenue, North, and extending back Northward 140 feet to the Southern line of First Alley, together with the buildings cmd improvements thereon(Italics supplied.)

The complaint…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tuskegee Land & Security Co. v. Birmingham Realty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  2. Gaynor v. BauerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1905
  3. Graves v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  4. Antomarchi's v. RussellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  5. McKenna v. EatonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Kirkland v. KirklandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  2. West Town Plaza Associates, Ltd. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  3. Humble Pipe Line Co. v. Wm. T. Burton Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1968
  4. Roberts v. MonroeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  5. David Lee Boykin Family Trust v. BoykinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API