Legal Opinion

Gonzalez v. Naman

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided May 17, 1996No. 2950367PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Scott M. Gonzalez and Siobhan R. Gonzalez appeal from the trial court's judgment declaring that David John Naman and his predecessors in interest had acquired certain property in Mobile County by adverse possession. By that judgment, the Gonzalezes lost their claim to an easement over the property.

The Gonzalezes and Naman own adjacent buildings on Dauphin Street in downtown Mobile. The Gonzalezes own 226 Dauphin Street, located on the corner of Dauphin and Joachim Street. Naman owns 224 Dauphin Street, which adjoins the Gonzalez property on the east side; the two buildings share a party wall.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Tidwell v. StricklerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  2. Kirkland v. KirklandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  3. Cotton v. MaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  4. Roberts v. MonroeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  5. Sasser v. Spartan Foods Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ex Parte GilleySupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  2. Aman v. GilleyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  3. Cagle v. HammondCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  4. Aman v. GilleyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  5. Arturo Villarreal v. Nita MossCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API