Legal Opinion
Tracinda Corp. v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER AG
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided April 7, 2005No. CIV.A. 00-993-JJFPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FARNAN, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This action was brought by Plaintiff, Tracinda Corporation, (“Tracinda”) against Defendants, DaimlerChrysler AG, Daimler-Benz AG (“Daimler-Benz” or “Daimler”), Jurgen Schrempp and Manfred Gentz (collectively, “Defendants”) alleging violations of securities laws, common law fraud and conspiracy in connection with the November 1998 merger between Chrysler Corporation (“Chrysler”) and Daimler-Benz AG (“Daimler-Benz”). A thirteen day bench trial was held on the claims and defenses raised by the parties. This Memorandum Opinion constitutes the Court’s…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Tracinda Corp. v. Daimlerchrysler AgCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Bauman v. Daimlerchrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Centerpoint Energy, Inc. v. Miller County Circuit CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
- Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. v. WiesemannDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2017
- Bauman v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.