Legal Opinion

Bauman v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 18, 2011No. 07-15386PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

644 F.3d 909 (2011)

Barbara BAUMAN; Gregory Grieco; Josefina Nunez; Gabriele Nunez; Miriam Nunez; Silvia Nunez; Emilio Guillermo Pesce; Mirta Haydee Arenas; Graciela Gigena; Guillermo Alberto Gigena; Nuria Gigena; Amelia Schiaffo; Elba Leichner; Anunciacion Spaltro De Belmonte; Hector Ratto; Eduardo Olasiregui; Ricardo Martin Hoffman; Eduardo Estiville; Alfredo Manuel Martin; Juan Jose Martin; Jose Barreiro; Alejandro Daer, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION; Daimlerchrysler AG, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 07-15386.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. Impossible Foods Inc. v. Impossible X LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  3. Helicopter Transport Services, LLC v. Sikorsky Aircraft Corp.District Court, D. Oregon · 2017
  4. Singh v. DaimlerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API