Legal Opinion

Tracinda Corp. v. Daimlerchrysler Ag

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 18, 2007No. 05-2363, 05-2482PublishedCited by 208 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROTH, Circuit Judge:

This appeal arises from the 1998 merger of Daimler-Benz AG, a German corporation and owner of the Mercedes-Benz brand, and Chrysler Corporation, one of the “Big Three” American automakers. Prior to closing, the merger had been billed as a “merger of equals,” with management of the new company, Daimler-Chrysler AG, to be shared equally between former Daimler-Benz and Chrysler executives. Shortly after the merger, however, several former Chrysler executives left the company, leaving a greater share of control to the former Daimler-Benz executives. In 2000, the CEO of…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by208 opinions

  1. Palmer v. ValdezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. EBC, Inc. v. Clark Building System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  3. In Re Energy Future Holdings Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  4. County of Orange v. United States District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  5. Wayne Land & Mineral Grp. LLC v. Del. River Basin Comm'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017

203 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API