Legal Opinion
Bauman v. Daimlerchrysler Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 18, 2011No. 07-15386PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
I
Plaintiffs-Appellants (the “plaintiffs”), twenty-two Argentinian residents,1 bring suit against DaimlerChrysler Aktiengesellschaft (DCAG) alleging that one of DCAG’s subsidiaries, Mercedes-Benz Argentina (MBA)2 collaborated with state security forces to kidnap, detain, torture, and kill the plaintiffs and/or their relatives during Argentina’s “Dirty War.”3 Some *912of the plaintiffs are themselves former employees of MBA and the victims of the kidnapping, detention, and torture, while others are close relatives of MBA workers who were “disappeared” and are…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Data Disc, Incorporated v. Systems Technology Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Panavision International, L.P., a Delaware Limited Partnership v. Dennis Toeppen Network Solutions, Inc., a District of Columbia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Loredana Ranza v. Nike, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- CollegeSource, Inc. v. AcademyOne, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- George Williams v. Yamaha Motor Corp. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Taishan Gypsum Co. v. GrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.