Legal Opinion

Forrest v. Forrest

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 2, 1954No. Civ. 19803PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOSK, J. pro tem. *

Plaintiff appeals from refusal of the court below to award alimony pendente lite after hearing on her order to show cause. The court concluded the proceeding by ordering “The matter of support of plaintiff is continued to time of trial.” An order was made for attorney’s fees and court costs, from which no appeal was taken.

The estranged husband and wife herein had been married for 18 years prior to their separation on September 1, 1947. Suit for divorce was filed by the appellant on October 31, 1952.

In the five-year interim appellant cared for an aged, invalided mother, for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Hall v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Lincoln v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Kalmus v. KalmusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Lamborn v. LambornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hansen v. HansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Meagher v. MeagherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. In Re Marriage of FischerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Hansen v. HansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Weinstock v. WeinstockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API