Legal Opinion
Weinstock v. Weinstock
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 13, 1962No. Civ. 25962PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.
This is an appeal from an order denying an application pendente lite for attorney’s fees, court costs, support and maintenance and other matters.
In a prior action, which will hereinafter be referred to as the divorce action (L. A. County No. WED 223), the plaintiff here (hereinafter referred to as the wife) secured an interlocutory decree of divorce on January 18, 1961, and during the course of this appeal the husband filed the application for the final decree of divorce and such final decree of divorce was granted on January 22, 1962.
In the interlocutory decree of divorce the judge at the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Vai v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Kellett v. KellettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Loeb v. LoebCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Goldring v. GoldringCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Schultz v. SteinbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Riverside v. HorspoolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- The City of Riverside v. Horspool CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2013