Legal Opinion

Flahive v. City of Dana Point

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 19, 1999No. G022514PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SEYMOUR, J.*

Lydia Flahive appeals the judgment in her action for negligence, trespass, and inverse condemnation against the City of Dana Point (the City) and West Coast Land-Clearing (West Coast), contending: (1) the warrant used to abate a nuisance on her property was void because the issuing court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, the court did not have jurisdiction over Flahive’s property, and the warrant was issued by a commissioner; (2) the trial court should have found liability under the California *243Tort Claims Act; and (3) the court should have awarded damages for inverse…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Leppo v. City of PetalumaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. Mohilef v. JanoviciCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. Gleaves v. WatersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Kriebel v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. Robinson v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Warkentine v. SoriaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2016
  2. Golden Gate Water Ski Club v. County of Contra CostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Clary v. City of Crescent CityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  4. County of Santa Clara v. EscobarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. City of Indian Wells v. Lawellin CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API