Flahive v. City of Dana Point
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SEYMOUR, J.*
Lydia Flahive appeals the judgment in her action for negligence, trespass, and inverse condemnation against the City of Dana Point (the City) and West Coast Land-Clearing (West Coast), contending: (1) the warrant used to abate a nuisance on her property was void because the issuing court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, the court did not have jurisdiction over Flahive’s property, and the warrant was issued by a commissioner; (2) the trial court should have found liability under the California *243Tort Claims Act; and (3) the court should have awarded damages for inverse…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Leppo v. City of PetalumaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Mohilef v. JanoviciCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Gleaves v. WatersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Kriebel v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Robinson v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Warkentine v. SoriaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2016
- Golden Gate Water Ski Club v. County of Contra CostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Clary v. City of Crescent CityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- County of Santa Clara v. EscobarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- City of Indian Wells v. Lawellin CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.