Legal Opinion
Clary v. City of Crescent City
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 30, 2017No. A143684PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STEWART,
Diehl, while a resident of Washington State, owned eight vacant lots in the City of Crescent City, California (City).1 Diehl appeals from the superior court’s denial of his petition for a writ of administrative mandate, brought under Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5. Diehl’s writ petition challenged the City’s determinations that the overgrown weeds and rubbish on his lots constitute a public nuisance that required abatement and, when he refused to abate the nuisance, that a lien be placed on his lots for the City’s abatement costs.
*278Diehl has relentlessly asserted that the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. City of Rancho CordovaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Suk Yong Kim v. Sumitomo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- JKH Enterprises, Inc. v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kahan v. City of Richmond, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Mercury Ins. Co. v. Lara, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Inzana v. Turlock Irrigation Dist. Bd. of Dirs., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Blaser v. Cal. State Teachers' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- Dana Fedderson v. Cox Automotive Corporate Services, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2025
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.