Gleaves v. Waters
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PUGLIA, P. J.
In this appeal we decide that, absent exigent circumstances, the need summarily to abate a public nuisance does not of itself justify state invasion of legitimate privacy interests without consent or a warrant.
Plaintiffs petitioned the superior court for a writ of prohibition to restrain the execution of administrative inspection warrants directed to their properties which did not comply with the governing statute. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1822.50 et seq.) The trial court declared the issue moot because, although defective, the warrants had expired and an ancillary contempt…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Conner v. City of Santa AnaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Integral Development Corp. v. WeissenbachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Bezayiff v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Jay Bharat Developers, Inc. v. MinidisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Carsten v. City of Del MarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.