Legal Opinion

Gleaves v. Waters

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 6, 1985No. Civ. 24444PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PUGLIA, P. J.

In this appeal we decide that, absent exigent circumstances, the need summarily to abate a public nuisance does not of itself justify state invasion of legitimate privacy interests without consent or a warrant.

Plaintiffs petitioned the superior court for a writ of prohibition to restrain the execution of administrative inspection warrants directed to their properties which did not comply with the governing statute. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1822.50 et seq.) The trial court declared the issue moot because, although defective, the warrants had expired and an ancillary contempt…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Conner v. City of Santa AnaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. Integral Development Corp. v. WeissenbachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Bezayiff v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Jay Bharat Developers, Inc. v. MinidisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Carsten v. City of Del MarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API