Legal Opinion
Zartolas v. Nisenfeld
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 23, 1981PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBogdanski, C. J.
The complaint makes the following allegations. On November 20, 1976, the defendants A. Eli Nisenfeld and Esther Nisenfeld, 1 by warranty deed conveyed certain real estate to the plaintiffs. In the deed the defendants specifically described the land as situated in the town of Monroe, state of Connecticut and they designated the land by reference to a map on record in the office of the Monroe town clerk. By executing the deed the defendants warranted that they “are well seized of the premises as a good indefeasible estate in fee simple: and have good right to bargain and sell the same . . . and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Rush v. SavchukSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Lombard Brothers, Inc. v. General Asset Management Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Gaudio v. GaudioConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Scott C. Savin v. Harry H. RanierCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Rosenblit v. DanaherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Frazer v. McGowanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.