Legal Opinion
Rhoden v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Decided December 22, 1998No. CIV. A. 3:98CV212BNPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BARBOUR, District Judge.
This cause is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Having considered the Motions, Responses, Reply, Rebuttal, Surrebuttal, supporting and opposing memoranda, and all attachments to each, the Court finds that Defendant’s Motion is well taken and should be granted, and Plaintiffs’ Motion is not well taken and should be denied.
I. Factual Background and Procedural History
This case involves a claim for damages under a homeowners insurance policy. The parties dispute whether the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Kennett-Murray Corporation v. John E. BoneCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Lillian Washington, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Arsane Washington v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- National Screen Service Corporation v. The Poster Exchange, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Rachel Moore v. Mississippi Valley State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Fayad v. Clarendon Nat. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2005
- Leonard v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- Chase v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Tuepker v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.