Legal Opinion

Orozem v. McNeill

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 6, 1918No. 21,651PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Crawford district court; Andrew J. Curran, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

Kethi Robar Orozem brought an action against C. A. McNeill, charging him with having retained too large a portion of a collection made for her through him. A demurrer to her petition, on the ground that the action was one for relief on the ground of fraud, and was barred by the two-year statute of limitations, was overruled. The defendant appeals.

The petition set out substantially these facts: The plaintiff had a claim against a railroad company on account of the death of her husband. She made a contract with a lawyer to undertake the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fanson v. LinsleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
  2. Young v. WhittenhallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
  3. Nelson v. StullSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ablah v. EymanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  2. Garrett v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. MacKey-woodard, Inc. v. Citizens State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  4. Rucker v. HagarSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  5. Common School District No. 18 v. Twin Falls Bank & Trust Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1932

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API