Legal Opinion

Rucker v. Hagar

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 8, 1924No. 25,385PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*77The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action was one by the holders of a promissory note, to recover from a person who had negotiated the note by delivery, and whose name did not appear upon it. A demurrer to the petition was sustained on the ground it did not state a cause of action, and plaintiffs appeal. The question is whether the action was barred by the statute of limitations.

The note was given on October 14, 1913, and was payable four years after date. The makers were James W. Hagar and Lucy A. Hagar, and the payee was David H. Hagar. When offered in evidence, the note…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Atchison Grain Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  2. Orozem v. McNeillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Crabb v. Swindler, AdministratrixSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  2. Price, Administrator v. HolmesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  3. McCoy v. Wesley Hospital & Nurse Training SchoolSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  4. Home Indemnity Co. v. State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  5. Freeto Construction Co. v. American Hoist & Derrick Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API