In Re Appeal of the Kroger Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
LOCKETT, J:
Multistate taxpayer appeals the Board of Tax Appeals’ (BOTA) order disallowing as an apportionable business expense an interest expense incurred to fight a hostile takeover. BOTA classified the expense as a nonbusiness expense, which was allocated to the taxpayer s state of commercial domicile. Taxpayer appealed, claiming its interest expense was a business expense, apportionable to Kansas.
The taxpayer, The Kroger Co. (Kroger), and the Department of Revenue (KDR) stipulated that late in 1988, Kroger, an Ohio corporation operating retail food…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Union Carbide Corp. v. HuddlestonTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
- Commissioner v. Lincoln Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Polaroid Corp. v. OffermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- Western Natural Gas Co. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
- In Re the Appeal of University of Kansas School of MedicineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- May Department Stores Co. v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 2001
- Jim Hudson, in His Official Capacity as Secretary and Director of the Arkansas Department of Finance and Administration v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2024
- Jim Hudson, in His Official Capacity as Secretary and Director of the Arkansas Department of Finance and Administration v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2024
- Bicknell v. Kansas Dept. of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022