Legal Opinion

British American Oil Producing Co. v. Midway Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 5, 1938No. 27738PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

The plaintiff, Midway Oil Company, instituted this suit against the British American Oil Producing Company to recover an undivided one-half interest in two oil and gas leases described as the Piersol lease and the Russell Place lease. It was the theory of plaintiff, Midway, that the defendant, British American, held in said leases a one-half interest for itself, and a one-half interest in trust for Midway.

This contention was based upon a business relationship which was founded upon a contract between British American and the Victor Oil Company. The interest of Victor Oil Company, hereinafter…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Wendt v. FischerNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Trice v. ComstockCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  4. Selwyn Co. v. . WallerNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Case v. . CarrollNew York Court of Appeals · 1866

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Warner v. WinnTexas Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Carey v. HumphriesNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
  3. ENI Producing Properties Program Ltd. Partnership 1982-I Ex Rel. Baytide Petroleum, Inc. v. Samson Investment Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  4. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. GrimSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. Tenneco Oil Co. v. BogertDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API