Legal Opinion
Shuler v. Viger
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 9, 1926No. 17078PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
PINKHAM, C.
Isaac Shuler, the plaintiff in error, was the defendant in the trial court, and the defendants in error E. G. Viger and O. D. Hughes were plaintiffs. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.
The plaintiffs alleged in their petition that on and prior to August 4, 1919, the defendant was the owner of a certain string of standard tools for the drilling of oil wells, and that he was desirous of selling the same, and that, acting through and by his authorized agent, one T. A. Simpson, he agreed orally with the plaintiffs that if they would sell the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McDonald, Adm'r v. StrawnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Gaar, Scott & Co. v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Nowata Oil Syndicate v. Commercial Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
3Cited by13 opinions
- Master Commodities, Inc. v. Texas Cattle Management Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- Hazelrigg Trucking Co. v. DuvallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- American National Bank of Enid v. CrewsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- First National Bank v. KerrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. GrimSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.