People v. Skoff
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The defendant was convicted by a jury of driving his automobile while he was under the influence of intoxicating liquor, contrary to the provisions of section 112 of the California Vehicle Act. Upon motion therefor, a new trial was granted. The state has appealed.
The defendant is a farmer residing near Cotati. At 9 o’clock on the evening of August 28, 1932, a collision oc curred on the highway near his home between the defendant’s' automobile and a machine which was being driven by the prosecuting witness, Marie Gutermute. The defendant claimed the wheels of his car had dropped into…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. Ah SamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- People v. AmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- State v. GondeiroMontana Supreme Court · 1928
- Duncan v. Oakland BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- People v. BangeneaurCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
3Cited by26 opinions
- People v. DennisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- People v. SalasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- People v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- People v. RothrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- People v. SimpsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.