Legal Opinion
Colorado Visionary Academy v. Medtronic, Inc.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided July 7, 2000No. CIV.A. 99-N-1628PublishedCited by 112 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO AMEND
BOLAND, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before me on the Motion to Amend Defendants’ Answer to Plaintiffs Amended Complaint and Memorandum Brief In Support (the “Motion to Amend”), filed June 15, 2000. The plaintiff, Colorado Visionary Academy (“CVA”), opposes the Motion to Amend. Because the defendants have failed to establish good cause in support of their request to alter the Scheduling Order entered in. this case, the Motion to Amend is DENIED.
CVA is a charter school.1 In June of 1999, CVA executed a “term sheet” concerning the purchase by CVA of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Dilmar Oil Co., Inc. v. Federated Mut. Ins. Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1997
- Denmon v. RunyonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1993
3Cited by112 opinions
- Pumpco, Inc. v. Schenker International, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2001
- Nowell v. Medtronic Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2019
- Lehman Bros. Holdings Inc. v. Universal American Mortgage Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 2014
- Fernandez v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2000
- Perez v. Denver Fire DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2017
107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.