Legal Opinion

ANDREW PEEPLES, and MICHELLE PEEPLES, by and through her Power of Attorney, GREGORY HOUSTON v. DOORDASH, INC., and AARON MILLARD

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided December 24, 2025No. 1:25-cv-01640Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Nina Y. Wang Civil Action No. 25-cv-01640-NYW-SBP ANDREW PEEPLES, and MICHELLE PEEPLES, by and through her Power of Attorney, GREGORY HOUSTON, Plaintiffs, v. DOORDASH, INC., and AARON MILLARD, Defendants. ORDER This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend Complaint to Add New Defendant Paula Millard (“Motion to Amend” or “Motion”). [Doc. 27, filed August 11, 2025]. The Motion to Amend is opposed by both Defendants: Defendant DoorDash, Inc. (“DoorDash”), [Doc. 32], and Defendant Aaron Millard (“Mr.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Minter v. Prime Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  2. Robert H. E. Frank, Jerry D. Mooberry, Tyrone G. Moreno v. U.S. West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  3. McPhail v. Deere & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  4. Calderon v. Kansas Department of Social & Rehabilitation ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  5. Gohier v. EnrightCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API