Legal Opinion

Parker v. Supermarkets General Corp.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 24, 1995No. 12834PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDupont, C. J.

The defendant in this negligence action appeals from a judgment rendered in accordance with a jury verdict for the plaintiff, awarding the plaintiff *648a total of $64,605 in damages, $13,140 for past noneconomic damages and $51,465 for future noneconomic damages. The sole issue is whether the trial court improperly instructed the jury that it could award damages for future pain and suffering without expert medical testimony if the jury inferred from the evidence that the plaintiffs injuries were permanent in nature. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The jury reasonably could have found…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Boland v. VanderbiltSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
  2. Goodmaster v. HouserSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. Varley v. MotylSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  4. Robinson v. Itt Continental Baking Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1984
  5. Trani v. Anchor Hocking Glass CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kalams v. GiacchettoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  2. Shegog v. ZabreckyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  3. Poulin v. YasnerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  4. Sherman v. Bristol Hospital, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  5. Esposito v. SchiffConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API