Legal Opinion

Matter of Fox

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 2, 1997No. 24687PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

In this attorney discipline matter, Respondent is charged with professional misconduct arising out of the collection of attorneys’ fees from a multiple-party settlement. We find Respondent’s actions constitute misconduct warranting a public reprimand.

FACTS/PROCEDURAL POSTURE

On February 16,1987, John Sept (“Deceased”) was killed in a car wreck. Attorney Jerry Screen was hired March 11, 1987, by Cassaundra Green to pursue a wrongful death action, claiming her minor son LaShon Green (“Minor”) was Deceased’s natural child. Screen associated Respondent to assist him with the case. A petition was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Tiger, Inc. Ex Rel. Green Apple Partnership v. Fisher Agro, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  3. Schneider v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. In the Matter of LempesisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  5. Tubbs v. BowieSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. In re SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  3. Fleming v. Sagan (In Re Sagan)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1998
  4. Goggin v. Blythe Construction IncDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2022
  5. Goggin v. Blythe Construction IncDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API